Epstein – The plot is thicker than you think

Alan Dershowitz says giving Maxwell a pardon is the only way…

Why ?

He is implicated in the files as well. He wants to keep this from going anywhere. He can be prosecuted as a PEDO as well.

Will she take a deal ? Or end up hanging herself like Epstein ?

I somehow think if she is pardoned and released, she will still end up dead. To many folks have their lives on the line. The compromat can continue. Look what happened to Epstein. But this time it will have to look different. If she dies in prison, there will be no stopping investigations and conspiracy theory.

Epstein is a dead man now, the ‘physical evidence’ against him should be public. Video, and documents.
We don’t need the grand jury testimony. Not allowed anyway. Dead end. Does not implicate the whole.

Bill Bar (Trump admin DOJ) as he went to capture all the files and evidence related to Epstein to keep it under wraps just after Epstein hung himself?

It was the way and the speed in which he did it that gave it away.
There is a normal process for that, that had been superseded. Did someone actually review all of this ? If there was a review, there would have been more charges to the others. So, that is the first cover-up. Perhaps the second since all of this was known to have started in Florida.

The physical evidence leads to 47’s participation in this at a higher level than Epstein. He was more than just one more PEDO client.

The whole operation was to produce compromat to wield more power and influence.
How else can you get all these law makers to follow what makes them appear they have absolutely no morals or spine. So the admin only promotes folks they have compromat, so they can have control over them. Of course this PEDO operation was not the only method of capturing compromat, Russia KGB/FSB had been hacking government computers for a decade for it. Ease dropping on phone calls and the whole power of intelligence operation in a plot to take control of the US government from within.

Want a model for this ? Then you obviously have not paid attention to the same actions they have used against Europe or Africa and South America.

When they needed the leverage, they exercised what they have.

Yea… we imported the swamp ! As opposed to draining it as they said. This is completely inline with how Putler/KGB/FSB operate.

 

You must be interested in stopping all this compromat influence.

The only way to do that is to expose the entire mess. No matter who is implicated.

Why is that such a bar to far ?

 

Now we have a cover up. But to open all of this, we need evidence of a crime, then the cover up becomes plausible. Even though it is obvious what is going on, this is law and it is what it is with rules. Hence the desperation about the release of a even just one crime within. Show any cover-up and it’s all on fire.

You just can’t get tired of hearing about this till we know it all. Think of all this compromat still in play. And it is effecting your life even if you can’t see it directly. It effects decisions in government and corporations play with money and that handshake with government that keeps getting larger.

 

They have turned the US into the Russian model of oligarchs and control. And the whole time you were told to pay attention to flag issues and immigrant issues and abortion issues.

Can’t keep your eye on the ball.

Best defense extortion can provide

So,

Trump controls the blackmail of the Epstein files !

Cash Cow Baby !

Best defense extortion can provide. Because you don’t know who or what is in them.

Dead PEDO still off the hook ?

If there are no victims, there is no crime ? There has to be a perpetrator in a PEDO case.

That is a new argument for and from Ghislaine Maxwell.

She was prosecuted for the same acts with Epstein. But was there no crime ? who are the perpetrators of said crimes she facilitated the acts ?

 

Don’t they deserve punishment as well ? You can’t have half of a crime.

Can you sell drugs and not be prosecuted because you did not make or use them ?

 

All of this started from a case in Florida which is worth anyone’s attention. Don’t take my word for it, look it up.

I do wonder how much it cost him to get a non-jail term sentence of 18 months for that ?

Bondi and the DA involved have very nice jobs in the admin now.
47 now has dirt on them both and very controllable.
That is how it works.

You can’t sell just a little part of your sole, you loose it all. It just takes multiple instances to realize it.

Have you ever herd of a multi victim pedo case not serving up jail time ? Or even a single one ? Just how did they keep that from headline rollover back then ?

 

Think of the money changing hands now just to to keep this under wraps.

You want to stop AI ?

I keep being told I can not stop AI

I agree ‘I will not stop AI’ and I don’t exactly want to. Just give it some guard rails.

 

In a convo with other programmers, mostly web, a bit of a trivial response from me when told it did not need to steal my code ?

But if it did not need my code, then it would be able to generate the same on the asking, and it can’t, Yet. and I intend to keep it that way for as long as I can .
And still it does not ‘need it’. Unless someone is looking for it. Then no credit for my work.
I guess it depends on if you can generate unique specific coding or reworked trivial previously published code.

Just how do the courts deal with this ?

If AI was that smart, you would only need to give it the rules of the language and let it go.
But that is not how it works.
But it can do things for you much faster. That is not smart, just faster.

Those of you who monetize solutions will find anyone can do the same now. Value ? Demand ? Pay cut ? Cookie cutter solutions !
Make it while you can.

My first dive into AI in the 80’s (wasn’t called that then) was in voice recognition. And all of AI is based off the same thing. Fuzzy logic. And that does mean it is not always correct.
All AI has a internal stat called confidence level (error rating or other terms). And they are not telling you that number.
And it also fails to look at other factors like opening your code up for hack. Which, if you did not write it yourself, I doubt you will have any clue where you might be open or where to even look.

Will it then blame the source of the info it handed out ?

It’s going to use previously published examples. Only you don’t know which ones for they are not credited.

Once AI absorbs published data, it belongs to it. Pieces of this and pieces of that. Does it create anything new or a salad of others work ?

You could do the same thing. But you know who the authors are. Perhaps you trust some more than others ?

I find it funny, that one open source project I am lightly involved in has a few authors that come up with the new features and functions quite quickly. And every time they are submitted in the build, a bunch of other code goes haywire. Of course that is not web programming but microcomputer and hardware code (Extended DAQ basically in a synthetic radio env) but has web gui access.

Draw your own conclusions. But my conclusions were he did not build it or he would have known the issues as he went along. AI was not given the comprehensive parameters of what exactly was going on. So failure. Not interested in studying it, but sometimes it is obvious. And they make a bonus from requests for feature development by followers.

Google was totally free at one time… almost. What will you do when you forget how and they start charging a fee for access. All things to think about if you are young enough.

You don’t think GIT and other repo’s are the main grounds for AI shopping ? Better start thinking about protecting your own intellect.

You can donate your brain to the AI machine if you wish. While I love open source, I like to get paid for some things. Like others profiting with it.

 

Choices choices. Choose wisely.

Very confusing Trade Policy for South Korea & Japan ?

Trump is not a deal maker. He is a deal breaker. Even breaking trade deals he made himself for North America after breaking the previous NAFTA.

 

The US had a FREE TRADE Agreement with South Korea. That means both sides agreed they would not tariff or restrict trade between them.

Also see KORUS FTA – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States%E2%80%93Korea_Free_Trade_Agreement

OR see what the US says about the agreement before this was imposed. – https://www.cbp.gov/trade/free-trade-agreements/korea

Trump has now imposed a 25% tariff on South Korea.

Is there anyone in his admin that understands what they are doing ? What do you expect to gain when they are imposing no tariffs on you ?

South Korea holds 1.5% of all US debt. If they quit buying US debt, do you think Japan will step up it purchases of US debt ?

Just like the 25% tariff on Japan. Does ‘anyone’ in this admin know who is buying all this extra US debt that is being created ?

Japan holds more than $ 1 Trillion of US debt and the question is, who might buy the new $4 Trillion being created right now ?

If Japan just quit buying NEW US DEBT, it would be catastrophic for the US.

Somebody better start thinking as this could explode quite quickly.

All that fuss over birth right citizenship… REALLY ?

We have all herd the news on this, but we really have no good explanation for it.

I had always assumed it was a immigration issue.

Not so fast….

Could it be that Trump, who despises Obama so badly, has motivation here.

We should all remember the ‘birther’ comments he has either made, repeated or promoted to Obama.

Now considering all the BS with ‘Hunters Laptop’. this theory may not be so far off. IPSE DIXIT style.

If you remove birthright citizenship as a rule, just some more fake accusations on the citizenship of a mother in Hawaii and you are on a steam roll to wipe out everything Obama did in office.

Problem is, even some of our early leaders might also fall under that clause. That is why the rule was created in the first place.

Just a thought. Keep it in the back of your mind because as we have seen, there is nothing he won’t try.

But doesn’t that just make more sense than anything else.